EA or Not? That is the Question!

[berto]

... it was proved many times beyond doubt it was flawed ...

"Proof" by anecdote?

Now (soon) that we (you) have the new Logging system, also the capability to do Automated Testing, and together with my several test systems, I will be able to run hundreds of test trials "proving" one thing or another.

Carefully designed test scenarios that I run by the hundreds might tell me that, on average, outcome A occurs X% of the time, outcome B occurs Y% of the time, outcome C Z% of the time. Hard statistical facts, not conjecture or "war stories".

I'm not prejudging the EA issue one way or the other. I'm not denying that A happens, or asserting that B does or doesn't happen. I'm just saying we don't really know, we don't know the relative frequency of A vs. B (vs. C), until we exhaustively test.

Careful coding doesn't prove anything, anecdote doesn't prove anything. The proof is in the testing.