The Competition & Teaser Thread

[Xaver]

You are right ComradeP BUT this is not PzC and scale is divided by 4... a MG with this scale has more firepower value against infantry, even when a flamm III only have the turret MG as total usefull defensive weapon well, i think 7x1 is enough to mantein infantry at a non dangerous range for the steel box guys (i need say that flamm III only have a crew of 3, this is a good point to reduce the firepower compared with MG squads).

Ummm i allways take vehicles in PzC like this: a tank is the same as 10 soldiers, if an infantry unit has 100 soldiers with a soft attack of 5 for me firepower (100% with no bonus or penalties) is 100x5=500, a unit with 10 tanks with a soft attack of 5 for me is 10x10x5=500, maybe i am wrong but i allways use this and for me works.

I think they use here something like in Nap/ACW/EAW/SQB where weapons have a range table with weapon firepower by range, at least i think this work on this way but maybe Strela can say us something about this... i refer is not the same shoot at 500m (1-2 hexes) with a PzIII M over a T-34/76 that shoot at 1.000m (4-5 hexes).

The problem with flamm weapons is range, you need move in SQB hex scale to see range attacks, in PzC and even here in PzB the power of his main weapon is only avaliable in assaults, you miss the most important part of the weapon... the fear factor, you only add value to assualt in brute force but not the morale eater factor over enemy.

Today i wake up with excesive energy, sorry

EDIT: i dont know how i can miss this... the static flamm units... well, why the have a big assault value if they are static??? is not better increase their defensive value a little??? they cant assault... or they can do it???.

Oooo and is a great improvement see now the number of subunits joined in same unit over the old +++, great job!!!.