• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


MC: Lack of WP amphibious capability = NATO bias?
02-26-2014, 10:19 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-26-2014, 10:29 PM by Aaron.)
#4
RE: MC: Lack of WP amphibious capability = NATO bias?
From things I read about WP tanks/tactics snorkeling would be more of a last resort. If it was used at all it would be to put a company of tanks across to help secure the far side of the river while a pontoon was built but most would be ferried across whenever possible. As far as mass use of snorkeling even at a Bn level I dont see happening let alone a whole Bde or Div.

Aaron

Maybe a better question is why we can ferry troops across but not tanks/ifvs
Rangers Lead the Way
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: MC: Lack of WP amphibious capability = NATO bias? - by Aaron - 02-26-2014, 10:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)