• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


River crossing?
06-30-2014, 08:43 AM,
#16
RE: River crossing?
There is an issue with ferried units and supply. The reasoning is that how many engineer units would it take to supply and entire brigade, or regiment of units ferried across a river but with no bridge yet to connect them to the main base of supply for their side?

Since the supply rules are simple, it was thought to be gamey to allow players to move away for the river bank and advance a good distance, say to a nearby bridge with no risk because their units would be in full supply on the wrong side of the river.
Such a maneuver is desirable. To ferry across, move a km or two and take a bridge from both sides simultaneously is a historical capability. This is a risky endeavor under the current rules set as it should be.

To address the travel mode issue, the units are not technically in a column when landed on the other shore. Being in travel mode simulates that the unit, having just completed the ferry process to cross the river needs to reform and is vulnerable to a sharp and quick attack. Resulting disruption or lack of disruption form such an attack simulates the strength of the response by the defender of the river line. The IGoYouGo game system required at least one turn of this type of vulnerability to give a defender a chance to make a response. Otherwise ferrying becomes a risk free endeavor to an attacker. That does not seem right or historical.

On the ferrying players next turn, the travel mode can be changed to deployed status so the unit is now formed up and better able to defend itself.

Bottom line is the rules are what they are to simulate the risks involved in sending units across the river where they are on their own and difficult to support. The player has to weigh the risk/gain of the ferry operation. Whether the ferrying move is to send a attack force across the river or to evacuate, the risks are still present and the same. I think it is always good to allow players to make historical moves. Including a simulation of the risks, makes it more real IMHO.

Dog Soldier
Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything.
- Wyatt Earp
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
River crossing? - by Plain Ian - 06-26-2014, 06:18 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Dog Soldier - 06-26-2014, 06:32 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Mr Grumpy - 06-26-2014, 07:06 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Ricky B - 06-26-2014, 09:31 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Deturk - 06-26-2014, 10:50 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Ricky B - 06-26-2014, 11:48 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Sgt Jasper - 06-27-2014, 12:53 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Plain Ian - 06-27-2014, 07:58 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Outlaw Josey Wales - 06-28-2014, 02:06 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Plain Ian - 06-28-2014, 03:40 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Mr Grumpy - 06-28-2014, 04:21 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Outlaw Josey Wales - 06-28-2014, 11:55 AM
RE: River crossing? - by BigDuke66 - 06-29-2014, 01:54 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Ricky B - 06-29-2014, 03:33 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Mr Grumpy - 06-29-2014, 05:28 PM
RE: River crossing? - by Dog Soldier - 06-30-2014, 08:43 AM
RE: River crossing? - by Liquid_Sky - 07-01-2014, 01:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)