(11-07-2014, 04:07 AM)Steiner14 Wrote: I am amazed that you can be fooled so easily. To me their tactics is obvious: whining on the forums how difficult things are and how poor they were, while they are slowing down the improvements but speeding up content generation.
Well that was harsh and uncalled for. The public will likely never know the full story behind the reason for the delay, all I can do is assure everyone that the delay had nothing to do with nefarious motives, low prioritization or any number of ridiculous conspiracy theories that have been put forward.
(11-07-2014, 05:59 PM)Toblakai Wrote: Most of all I miss the possibility of an ambush. Units are spotted too easy if they are not hidden. And if they hidden they won't act.
Yeah, I would like to see something better here for sure. Setting up and ambush now takes a lot of work and only works when you can find just the right terrain.
(11-07-2014, 05:59 PM)Toblakai Wrote: Same with PAKs/ATGs. In my experience they are nearly useless, especially the 88. Maybe the issue is me, myself and I 
But in all my h2h battles I didn’t saw a useful usage of them.
The big 88 guns do get seen pretty quick some times but not so much if the distance is long. And I find that to be an issue with all AT guns - we often do not get to put them to use from long ranges. I would say that the newer releases have made seeing AT guns much more difficult for tanks. So, I think they have made improvements there.
(11-07-2014, 05:59 PM)Toblakai Wrote: And please no graphic effects that will break FOW!
Agreed. The bug with water splashing being visible to all was really annoying. As much as I would love to see tracks in the snow I would only be happy if it were added fully supporting FOW. That would be pretty tricky and I suspect they would prioritize it below many other features.
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
