• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


FWWC and Explicit Supply
01-08-2015, 03:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-08-2015, 04:02 PM by Volcano Man.)
#3
RE: FWWC and Explicit Supply
Yes, Rick is exactly right. VST is basically the safest choice. Explicit supply can create the most realistic results *IF* the amount of explicit supply units are "just about right". Unfortunately there is no real science to determining what "just right" is. :(

I did my best to calculate it, basically providing one 100 vehicle supply units per non-reserve corps per day (which is typically ~4 trains per army), and then the supply source % that it arrives at determines its arrival chance for that day. Of course the idea was to not provide excess, so that some armies have to sacrifice their supply to help out other armies that need it more. I put a lot of thought into it, but unfortunately you just have to try it out and see if you like it.

One good thing is true: both sides suffer or benifit equally from explicit supply in FWWC, because I used the same methods for both sides. In other words, it should be "balanced" either way.
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
FWWC and Explicit Supply - by HMCS Rosthern - 01-08-2015, 10:52 AM
RE: FWWC and Explicit Supply - by Ricky B - 01-08-2015, 01:48 PM
RE: FWWC and Explicit Supply - by Volcano Man - 01-08-2015, 03:25 PM
RE: FWWC and Explicit Supply - by Mr Grumpy - 01-09-2015, 04:39 AM
RE: FWWC and Explicit Supply - by Sgt Jasper - 01-11-2015, 10:24 AM
RE: FWWC and Explicit Supply - by Volcano Man - 01-11-2015, 05:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)