(04-18-2015, 02:56 AM)raz_atoth Wrote: Hello gentlemen,
As i'm sure you noticed by now, there aren't a lot of scenarios out there which are balanced for H2H play out of the box. There's where theblitz comes into play
The goal is to modify the scenarios in order to make it as properly balanced for H2H play as possible.
The users who played the proposed scenarios for balancing are hereby kindly asked to provide their feedback on the scenario.
The current stats of the Devils to Isernia are:
Stats:
Axis Wins: 10
Draws: 5
Allied Wins: 1
From the stats alone, it looks like this scenario isn't suited for H2H in it's current form.
Units:
Axis:
3 x Infantry Platoons + HMGs + mortars
2 x SPW 251(9) - 75mm HT
1 x SPW 250(9) - 20mm HT
2 x SPW 251(10) - 37mm HT
1 x SPW 251(1) - MG HT
Allied:
3 x Infantry Platoons + HMGs + mortars
2 x T30 - 75mm HT
1 x M3 GMG - 75mm HT
1 x M15 - 37mm HT
2 X M2 - MG HT
* HMG - heavy machine gun
* HT - halftrack
Balancing Suggestions
When it comes to infantry, both sides are pretty much evenly balanced, imho. On the other hand, the axis side has 5 gun-carrying halftracks, while the allies have only 4. I believe the primary source of unbalance comes from the axis having both more and better armored HTs.
My suggestion is to give the US side 2 extra HTs. Perhaps 2 X M15 (37mm) HTs. The extra firepower should put the US on a more equal footing with the axis.
Thoughts?
I have played the scenario twice and as I recall the Axis did seem to have a slight edge in the halftracks, as you stated. I think you suggestion is a good one, I wouldn't recommend giving the Yanks any more 75mm HT's though