Is this game supposed to be realistic ?

[agmoss99]

Well I think I've said all I want to. It's a far better engine than Napoleonics. It is realistic. Certainly there is room for improvement in some of the scenarios - I left feedback on Seminara which I recently completed, for instance.

Changing a few Optional Rules can make quite a difference too. Rout Limiting OFF for instance makes your army that more fragile. But generally I play with it on, simply because unit qualities are far lower than in Napoleonics, and routing is far more common.

The Renaissance covers quite a lot of time and territory. And it's a generic term. But I'd say the battles covered are comprehensive and representative of the variety of that period. Each scenario has quite different parameters to cover different weapon and unit types. Siege warfare v open combat.