Normandy Patch Update

[ComradeP]

I'm not sure that morale check rule for losses actually works as documented Bayes, as statistically speaking <5 Men/D results should be uncommon in that case.

Also: battalions, particularly in older PzC games tend to be "PB size" at around 450 men to around 600 men. The only large battalions are those in recent PzC games where the Germans have 4 company battalions with abstracted heavy weapons, at 800 to 950 Men.

Note that the size of the unit in Men isn't part of the calculation, so an old PzC 450 Men battalion has the same chance of Disrupting from a certain number of losses than a 1000+ Men FWWC battalion.

The losses also only influence the chance a morale check is required, if the system works as documented, not that a morale check is passed. Losing 1 Man or 50 Men both might lead to the same morale check based purely on Quality. This causes those Soviet D quality units to go down like bowling pins in PzC.

If Disruptions would work as a two step as described in the manual, they should be rare to uncommon for low number of men lost results.

Some tests with D quality battalions and their Disruption chance:

10 Men/D= (10/(10+15)) x (3/6 simplified to 1/2) = 20% chance of failing their check.
28 Men/D= ((28/(28+15)) x "" = 32.5% chance of failing their check.
3 Men/D= (3/(3+15)) x "" = 8.3% chance of failing their check.
5 Men/D (5/(5+15)) x "" = 12.5% chance of failing their check.