• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Explicit Supply question
12-15-2016, 10:27 PM,
#3
RE: Explicit Supply question
(12-15-2016, 09:01 AM)Mr Grumpy Wrote: I believe a scenario that is designed to use explicit supply has the supply units included in the OOB that the scenario uses, I think this is the only reason it is flagged as a "s" scenario on the filename and not using the rule and opting for the VST rule instead should not have any effect on game play.

If I remember in the first titles to be release after explicit supply was added to the game (like Tobruk) there were two versions of each scenario one with a "s" to indicate that ES could be used and another without the "s", as the series progressed I think it just became normal for all scenarios to have the "s" on their filenames.

Hey Darran and Jon:  Smoke7

But if the explicit supply units are attacked, suffer casualties and / or destroyed by enemy action... it awards points to your opponent's scoreboard - correct?  

So, I "assume" that both sides that have explicit supply units in their OOB need to keep them hidden and far away from the front lines? Idea2
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 07:44 AM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Mr Grumpy - 12-15-2016, 09:01 AM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Kool Kat - 12-15-2016, 10:27 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:40 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Kool Kat - 12-16-2016, 11:09 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Ricky B - 12-15-2016, 11:35 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Mr Grumpy - 12-16-2016, 04:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)