• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Explicit Supply question
12-15-2016, 11:36 PM,
#5
RE: Explicit Supply question
(12-15-2016, 09:01 AM)Mr Grumpy Wrote: I believe a scenario that is designed to use explicit supply has the supply units included in the OOB that the scenario uses, I think this is the only reason it is flagged as a "s" scenario on the filename and not using the rule and opting for the VST rule instead should not have any effect on game play.

If I remember in the first titles to be release after explicit supply was added to the game (like Tobruk) there were two versions of each scenario one with a "s" to indicate that ES could be used and another without the "s", as the series progressed I think it just became normal for all scenarios to have the "s" on their filenames.

Thanks for the clarification!! I thought it should not effect play but wasn't sure and couldn't find a definitive answer in the manual.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 07:44 AM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Mr Grumpy - 12-15-2016, 09:01 AM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Kool Kat - 12-15-2016, 10:27 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:40 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Kool Kat - 12-16-2016, 11:09 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Ricky B - 12-15-2016, 11:35 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Mr Grumpy - 12-16-2016, 04:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)