• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Explicit Supply question
12-16-2016, 04:03 AM,
#8
RE: Explicit Supply question
(12-15-2016, 11:35 PM)Ricky B Wrote: I don't think, but could be wrong, that there were ever two versions of scenarios - I think the above is how things were from day one. But I do think the very earliest supply scenarios didn't include the s, and they were named that way in following titles to make it clear if they had supply units or not.


I looked at my Tobruk title and it did seem there were two versions, for example...........

#12 - Three Against One (19-20 November 1941)

#12s - Three Against One [Supply] (19-20 November 1941) it says in the description "NOTE: This scenario is for use with the optional Explicit Supply rules."

So I think for Tobruk they used this approach, but in later titles the "s" appears on almost all the scenario file names.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 07:44 AM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Mr Grumpy - 12-15-2016, 09:01 AM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Kool Kat - 12-15-2016, 10:27 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:40 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Kool Kat - 12-16-2016, 11:09 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Ricky B - 12-15-2016, 11:35 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by larsonney - 12-15-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: Explicit Supply question - by Mr Grumpy - 12-16-2016, 04:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)