• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Poll: Should the road stacking rules be optional?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
31.25%
5 31.25%
No
68.75%
11 68.75%
Total 16 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Proposed Optional Rule
02-20-2017, 11:51 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-20-2017, 11:54 PM by Kool Kat.)
#4
RE: Proposed Optional Rule
(02-19-2017, 11:22 PM)Many Mariuses Wrote: Hello all,

I have come to the conclusion that an optional rule should be created allowing players to turn off the road movement stacking rules.

While in theory this is a cool feature that adds to historical accuracy, in reality its just a giant pain. Essentially, to get the maximum movement from your units, you need to move each unit individually. This is ridiculously labor intensive in larger scenarios/campaigns, adds to play time, and contributes to hand and wrist fatigue. In my mind, the benefits of more realistic road movement hardly make up for the drawbacks in my mind. I would much rather be able to move an entire stack and not worry about it.

Gents:  Smoke7

IMO, managing road congestion and over stacking is one of the many challenges you face as a commander. Effective troop movement including the proper sequencing of unit movement (e.g. In MC, don't stack your WP mech battalions) so other units can utilize road movement, and ensure the right unit is available for follow on combat, is the hallmark of a good commander.

So, yes. This necessitates you move units individually. I never move units by stacks since many "bad" things can happen - Units with different MPs don't stay together, air interdiction triggers on a stack, your unit stack stumbles into defending enemy unit(s), individual units wander off on different routes, etc.

My vote is "No." Road movement stacking rules are essential and should not be made optional.
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Proposed Optional Rule - by Many Mariuses - 02-19-2017, 11:22 PM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by 76mm - 02-20-2017, 03:35 PM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by 76mm - 02-20-2017, 03:40 PM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by Kool Kat - 02-20-2017, 11:51 PM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by Many Mariuses - 02-21-2017, 11:52 PM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by Strela - 02-22-2017, 12:37 AM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by 76mm - 02-22-2017, 05:16 AM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by Many Mariuses - 02-23-2017, 11:33 PM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by 76mm - 02-24-2017, 08:16 AM
RE: Proposed Optional Rule - by Many Mariuses - 02-24-2017, 10:54 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)