Some controvesy (for fun) no offence meant
|
03-29-2017, 05:22 AM,
|
|
typhoon
Warrant Officer
|
Posts: 252
Joined: Sep 2003
|
|
RE: Some controvesy (for fun) no offence meant
To Strela I applaud all his efforts and I'm a big fan of Moscow 42 and the grand scope it captures. Though I would argue that PZ could go up in scale to division and Corp level with a map scale to match so the number of units and size of map may even be reduced. Yet the firing fatigue command rules could much remain the same and men might well be able to be tracked at battalion level in divisions with a tweek so that replacements can be allocated by the player where required. The decisions would more involve where to move those divisions east west desert or maybe only a one front at a time war.
I admit to knowing nothing about game design or codeing but the PZ system feels like it could fit a strategic level war with alright a good deal vof work on the air and naval side of things (btw why has no one ever made a game covering the battle of the Atlantic or the naval war in the Med great Naval battles is as close as it got I think).
As for Strela and Mr Grumpy on the matter of opponents I agree mostly but if the game is good enough you will find opponents War in the Pacific AE proves that. Though I must bow to the point that real life can often get in the way of a good game.Either way thanks for listening and taking the time to reply to this dreamer was a night I had no turn to play so posted out of fun
|
|
|
Messages In This Thread |
RE: Some controvesy (for fun) no offence meant - by typhoon - 03-29-2017, 05:22 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)