CMFI Results - A quick look

[Lethal]

Thx for the reply.

Gamers enjoy, most of all, a contest and at face value Probe and Meeting Engagement would appear to provide that by giving each player opportunities to win or lose the game. I would be pretty confident that most QBs would be in these categories.

I tend to think that players prefer being the Attacker because it confers the initiative. The Defender tends to be more reactive, it is a different type of challenge - one just as interesting I might add.

I thought that Assault would follow the Attack pattern but it went the other way. Perhaps those interested in learning the art of defence should take on Assault scenarios! Obviously the Assault maps have terrain advantages for the defender which are not so apparent in Attack maps.

Might be interesting to have an Assault Campaign/Competition to see if the numbers hold out.

I'm an average player at best and have yet to win a game as a Defender on an Attack map! Might try an Assault map!