Musket and Pike series...

[-72-]

[quote pid='423301' dateline='1512648228']
 Expect we can see soon™ new M&P title
[/quote]

Heh - um yeh those things in the field - I wanted something else. Is what I currently have the final answer? No, probably not, but it is for now.

The NATO symbols, while I think it can be better, right now it is sharper than what it had been (it has to be- I cleaned off enough fragments ... nevermind that ).   But the real answer is, I can't use anyone else's material like that -so if it changes, it has to be something that I come up with. 

What am I waiting for? Ok, say that someday I get instructions to go ahead and make up another, larger, 2D set of graphics - then that changes what you can do with that room (on the larger counters) -and that is what I am looking at working with when I get to focus on some graphics again.  To be clear, though, I am not saying this is happening, but I might want to show that it can and that it is not really a lot more work. 

My point being, I have seen the ones Petersburg uses, and if I were to use that as a demonstration model ... I think that on that set, for sure, there are a lot of possibilities; there sure is a lot of room there with which to work. I started messing around with it maybe 4 or so weeks ago, but since then I have had some 'competing priorities' come up in some areas, so that has been put on the backburner.

Since I am talking about demonstrating techniques, I had thought trying my hand at painted 3d maps if for no other reason, than to learn the process. But even if I do, it doesn't mean that anything like that is anything but a picture -and not necessarily ever be usable in a game title.  It is more showing that it can be done.  I don't know when that might happen - but I want to understand the methodology

As for the bit I left up there ... all I can say is my own major portion of it is done. And I get to focus on the next one after that again.