• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


LFG CMFB (or CMBN)
07-28-2018, 01:03 AM,
#4
RE: LFG CMFB (or CMBN)
Well I see what you were trying to do. Makes sense in that context. Although I never play assaults because I find them so unbalanced.

Probes are my preferred QB's due to the tighter point spread between sides. Probes also place more emphasis on casualty count than attacks or assaults do. I think casualty count should be more prevalent in the final score than it is. Many times I see players gamey bum rush objectives (or use gamey suicide tactics) with no regard to their force or casualties, they occupy the objectives and get a win even though they have taken 60% or more casualties. To me players who have no regard for the casualties their side takes should not win, and although Probes are still not the solution to that problem they are the closest thing to it.

Even with the closer point spread I find giving the attacker -10% is very acceptable. But 0 is of course fine to.

So that's my thinking. I'll look for your PM.
Sometimes I'm around a lot and can get many turns done, other times I can't. I'll always finish the games.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
LFG CMFB (or CMBN) - by H1nd - 07-26-2018, 02:06 AM
RE: LFG CMFB (or CMBN) - by WillS - 07-27-2018, 06:50 AM
RE: LFG CMFB (or CMBN) - by H1nd - 07-28-2018, 12:17 AM
RE: LFG CMFB (or CMBN) - by WillS - 07-28-2018, 01:03 AM
RE: LFG CMFB (or CMBN) - by H1nd - 07-31-2018, 12:48 AM
RE: LFG CMFB (or CMBN) - by MichaU - 07-31-2018, 03:44 AM
RE: LFG CMFB (or CMBN) - by H1nd - 08-02-2018, 05:39 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)