(04-08-2021, 10:22 PM)Plain Ian Wrote: Mmmh well I still don't understand this rule? Are we saying pure armour attacks are better than a supported infantry attacks whether the support is 'adequate' or not? That doesn't make sense?
Start adding infantry to an attack and there is a chance your armour will be penalised?
I don't think that's the case. Take Green's second example: 20 tanks assaulting 50 men results in
5 unsupported tanks.
Now add just 10 men to the attacking hex. You have a total of 10 supporting infantry. The defending infantry exceeds the supporting infantry by 40 men, and that translates to
4 unsupported tanks.
So even this small amount of infantry is beneficial. Hope I got all of that right...?