Wanting opponents please!

[naughtkris]

>My couple of "what I want"s (lol, even now I can not to find a right term for that; 'wish' and 'desire' are about feels, >not my sense; 'require' after translation sounds is too rude, I am not sure) that I mentioned above in my big one

Understood. You can phrase that a couple of ways. I'll demo as if I was asking you the same thing.
"Hey Chris, Can you do me a favour and..."
"Chris, I'd like to make a request that..."
" Everything is great, but I just wanted to be clear that..."

All the above mean more or less the same thing. They are also reasonably polite- not that that is a requirement.





>(never thought that I am capable to write something so long and sincere, even on my native language, lol):

You're doing great. Keep it up.

>1. I am want that you will makes a notes before you quit from battles to real life for some needs for more then 4 >days.

No worries. Unless article 5 gets invoked, I don't plan on going anywhere till next year. There's some stuff happening in the China Sea that needs looking into. I'll keep you informed if I can't do my turns.


>2. I am want that you do not '* (can not find right term in English, my sense is by reference)' to me.
>(*). "Poddavat'sja (on Translit)" it is "intentionally lose in competition; performed usually when compete against child >or against someone who is really bad in competition; performed by more experienced competitor with reason do not >to upset other competitor".

So in English, that would be best expressed as "letting you win". The expression describes everything Poddavat'sia means.  An example;
" Oh come on, I want a fair fight, don't just let me win!" The emphasis is on the 'let'.

But I understand what you are requesting. For clarity, I was treating these as "training" games, so you can get used to the mechanics of the program and some familiarity with the military content. In the military, you learn to do a practice round, so that when you need to do it for real, you can bring your A-game [your very best effort].

I assure you I'm not letting you win. For sure, I haven't used every trick up my sleeve, but this is as I said above- I want you at your best for the next game. If I win, I want it to be because my tactics were better, and not just because you were unfamiliar with how parts of the game work.

As is, I think you have a very good chance of winning the R vs B match.
As for the B vs R match, well, we'll just have to wait and see on that one





>"After all this my talks - about: mistakes, meanings, feelies, understandings, etc. - you are probably already think >that I am 'soft **nt (with perfectly clear british accent, please)'. But I am not, so do not '*' to me."**

I'm professional military. I do a lot of instructing (training of others). This requires that I also be able to sum up (judge, determine, investigate) the personality and quality of people.

I don't for a second think you are soft or weak. Soft or weak people don't put this much effort into learning and understanding.

Now if you mean, "inexperienced", that I assume you are with regards to CMCW and perhaps 1980's era military tactics. This is the area I was looking to give you (more) experience. After these two battles, I think you'll be more than ready for a more brutal game.

>My #2 is very important for me. If you see that you already is can to win, doing it. After, tell me where my mistakes >(^W)*** errors and then ask about one more fight, if you want. For me final result (who win) not so important. >High quality of process (game, fight, competition) it is that what important for me. I am logically understand that >you think about current battles as examination and teaching of me, and you already did something like that (or p>robably you are really is so bad; a couple so stupid moves, lol)**.**** If we will have 'gloves off' fights at someday i>n a future. DO NOT '*' TO ME!

You have my word, from this turn on, I will try my best. But should you have any questions, I'll still answer them in full. It wasn't so much that I was making intentional mistakes, but more that I wasn't taking as much detail in my plans and manoeuvres. More slap-dash than intentional.



>My mind gave birth so many stupid jokes. I want to tell them out very much. If you laughed out from previous ones, >from the next ones - I guess - you will **ssing in.

Lay them on me!  (I am receptive to hearing them when you are ready).