08-19-2007, 01:25 AM,
|
|
majog
Captain
|
Posts: 498
Joined: Sep 2000
|
|
Half track question
Ok here is something sure to start a debate again. But since the German halftracks were mounted with the same MG as used by the MG teams in the OOB's why do they not have the same fire rate, effect and range as MG platoons. Also since they come 6 and not 4 to a platoon should not the fire effect be greater as would the defense effect of being in an armored vehical?
:smg:
|
|
08-19-2007, 02:58 AM,
|
|
RE: Half track question
majog Wrote:Ok here is something sure to start a debate again. But since the German halftracks were mounted with the same MG as used by the MG teams in the OOB's why do they not have the same fire rate, effect and range as MG platoons. Also since they come 6 and not 4 to a platoon should not the fire effect be greater as would the defense effect of being in an armored vehical?
:smg:
They were, some how they were reverted back to the old halftrack values. This will be fixed in 1.03.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Jason Petho
|
|
08-19-2007, 03:11 AM,
|
|
majog
Captain
|
Posts: 498
Joined: Sep 2000
|
|
RE: Half track question
The old values are also still in original WF &EF
|
|
08-19-2007, 03:12 AM,
|
|
RE: Half track question
Yeah, but wouldn't all halftracks used by all nations end up with enhanced firepower in that case? In that case an M3 halftrack would have the same firepower as a dismounted .50 cal machinegun team.
"Would you like a large or small crater with that, sir?"
- Republic Commando RC-1262 "Scorch"
"Just get us inside without killing the squad, okay Scorch?"
- RC-1138 "Boss"
|
|
08-19-2007, 03:13 AM,
|
|
majog
Captain
|
Posts: 498
Joined: Sep 2000
|
|
RE: Half track question
The old values are also still in original WF &EF.
j
|
|
08-19-2007, 03:29 AM,
|
|
majog
Captain
|
Posts: 498
Joined: Sep 2000
|
|
RE: Half track question
That is my arguement that they should be the same as dismounted units. what is the difference... same gun. same ammo. just more armor
|
|
08-19-2007, 04:54 AM,
|
|
RE: Half track question
majog Wrote:That is my arguement that they should be the same as dismounted units. what is the difference... same gun. same ammo. just more armor
Like I noted, they will be fixed in 1.03.
Jason Petho
|
|
08-20-2007, 05:23 AM,
|
|
RE: Half track question
Ah Generals,
Wasn't the gunner an entegral part of the mounted infantry unit?Thus with no infantry the firepower should be.....dare I say...........0000000000000...........and thus ends von Earlmann's part in the latest great 1/2 track debate.......LOL
"The secret to success is not just doing the things you enjoy but rather enjoying everything that you do."
|
|
08-20-2007, 05:25 AM,
|
|
majog
Captain
|
Posts: 498
Joined: Sep 2000
|
|
RE: Half track question
That is true so all 1/2 tracks should either need 2 passengers, LOL or they should be considered as part of the crew manning the vehicle. THe same can hold true for armor units. no crew no firing.
|
|
08-20-2007, 06:14 AM,
|
|
RE: Half track question
Von Earlmann Wrote:Ah Generals,
Wasn't the gunner an entegral part of the mounted infantry unit?Thus with no infantry the firepower should be.....dare I say...........0000000000000...........and thus ends von Earlmann's part in the latest great 1/2 track debate.......LOL
My understanding is that the rear MG was the squad served weapon, which was dismounted when the squad exits the vehicle, while the front MG was the vehicle weapon served by the #2 of the halftrack crew.
Jason Petho
|
|
|