Long War Scenario Playtesters requested...

Mad_Dog · (This post was last modified: 03-21-2009, 05:05 AM by Mad_Dog.)

Alright, I fixed everything up, and got a little more organized. My scenario "Van Doos in Lacookhal" is ready to test.

You can download here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=0f705...f6e8ebb871

I'm sorry the site is slow, please be patient. :) It's free....:/

I'm also uploading to the H2H database. Thanks for all your help guys!

Mad_Dog · 03-21-2009, 05:10 AM,

IronX Wrote:Just the first three is all you need.

I will add the new weapons to the master weapon dat file and they will be available in a future update. It's unlikely that they will be compatible with your scenario, however.

The only big difference is the range. My scenario is small enough it doesn't matter, but on a larger one it might make a difference. I made the C7 the same as the M16A2, just changed the name.

Jeff Conner · 03-21-2009, 10:30 AM,

Mad Dog:

Your second scenario opened fine for me. I don't know what the difference was, perhaps it was as simple as a file corrupted in transit. I approved it for testing at H2H so it should be available there for anyone who wants to take a look. I haven't had a chance to take a look at it yet, but I will shortly and give you some feedback.

Jeff Conner
SB H2H Custodian

Ozgur Budak · 03-21-2009, 10:32 AM,

Scenario opened fine. First of all it doesnt have a title :) Otherwise looks like a quick&fun one.

Mad_Dog · 03-21-2009, 10:53 AM,

Thanks Jeff!

Fixed the title ;)

fastphil · 03-24-2009, 12:22 PM,

hey Gents:

I have play-tested this from both sides against Mad-Dog. What are the procedures for reporting here? Also if Iron X reads this does Long War and AIW have less leathality then the basic games? I have played several of both and it just seems the body count is down. Not a complaint just native curiosity. assault seems the same. RPGs are still a bitch. It just seems there is more freedom to maneuver with less lead poisoning involved.

Mad_Dog · 03-24-2009, 12:37 PM,

Go here Phil:

https://www.theblitz.club/h2h_production...opment.php

Thanks again for your help!

IronX · 03-24-2009, 01:10 PM,

fastphil: the lethality of small arms hasn't been downgraded. Guess your guys know how to use cover! Some of the larger weapons/bombs are more lethal, although I still believe their effects are less than realistic.

fastphil · 03-25-2009, 02:04 AM,

IronX Wrote:fastphil: the lethality of small arms hasn't been downgraded. Guess your guys know how to use cover! Some of the larger weapons/bombs are more lethal, although I still believe their effects are less than realistic.

After 3-400 SB matches I would hope so but after playing OZ:kill:

TheBigRedOne · 03-25-2009, 03:34 AM,

fastphil Wrote:hey Gents:

I have play-tested this from both sides against Mad-Dog. What are the procedures for reporting here? Also if Iron X reads this does Long War and AIW have less leathality then the basic games? I have played several of both and it just seems the body count is down. Not a complaint just native curiosity. assault seems the same. RPGs are still a bitch. It just seems there is more freedom to maneuver with less lead poisoning involved.

I'm not sure of the exact rules, but someone should see if playtesting on the H2H against the creator of the scenario is allowed under the H2H guildelines for the bonus points.