12-28-2010, 10:42 AM,
|
|
Jobu88
Major General
|
Posts: 1,481
Joined: May 2002
|
|
Opponents wanted
I got room for 4 or 5 more games. I prefer anything except quick battle meeting engagements. I will play attacker or defender in a QB; or play any scenario you want as long as it's halfway balanced. If it's not balanced I will still play it, as long as we can change sides when we're done and play it again.
"A bad plan is still better than no plan at all." -- Mikhail Tal
|
|
12-29-2010, 12:18 AM,
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
Herroberst accepts your challenge as our other two games will wrap up shortly. Think you'll take me in the one where I had to drive down the road with all my armor - hard fought, good work.
|
|
12-29-2010, 09:39 AM,
|
|
Jobu88
Major General
|
Posts: 1,481
Joined: May 2002
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
I sent you a 3-battle operation for your consideration. Let me know if it works for you. We can play something else if you don't like it.
"A bad plan is still better than no plan at all." -- Mikhail Tal
|
|
12-29-2010, 08:35 PM,
|
|
Andre
Brigadier General
|
Posts: 1,177
Joined: Apr 2000
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
ready for an battle or two :)
send over what ever you like Operations, Scenarios or QBs
send to [email protected]
Andre
|
|
12-30-2010, 04:57 AM,
|
|
Jobu88
Major General
|
Posts: 1,481
Joined: May 2002
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
Andre - file sent !
"A bad plan is still better than no plan at all." -- Mikhail Tal
|
|
12-30-2010, 04:05 PM,
|
|
noob
Sergeant
|
Posts: 68
Joined: Feb 2012
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
(12-28-2010, 10:42 AM)Jobu88 Wrote: I got room for 4 or 5 more games. I prefer anything except quick battle meeting engagements. I will play attacker or defender in a QB; or play any scenario you want as long as it's halfway balanced. If it's not balanced I will still play it, as long as we can change sides when we're done and play it again.
Do you have room for another game, i will send one through if you want, i only have CMAK though, is that ok ?
|
|
12-30-2010, 07:17 PM,
|
|
Jobu88
Major General
|
Posts: 1,481
Joined: May 2002
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
(12-30-2010, 04:05 PM)mash Wrote: (12-28-2010, 10:42 AM)Jobu88 Wrote: I got room for 4 or 5 more games. I prefer anything except quick battle meeting engagements. I will play attacker or defender in a QB; or play any scenario you want as long as it's halfway balanced. If it's not balanced I will still play it, as long as we can change sides when we're done and play it again.
Do you have room for another game, i will send one through if you want, i only have CMAK though, is that ok ?
Yes CMAK is OK. Send to [email protected]
"A bad plan is still better than no plan at all." -- Mikhail Tal
|
|
12-30-2010, 08:41 PM,
|
|
noob
Sergeant
|
Posts: 68
Joined: Feb 2012
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
"Yes CMAK is OK. Send to [email protected]"
Nice one, i have chosen a H2H scenario so it should be balanced, any side preference ?
|
|
12-31-2010, 06:06 AM,
|
|
Jobu88
Major General
|
Posts: 1,481
Joined: May 2002
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
(12-30-2010, 08:41 PM)mash Wrote: "Yes CMAK is OK. Send to [email protected]"
Nice one, i have chosen a H2H scenario so it should be balanced, any side preference ?
Either side is OK :cheeky:
"A bad plan is still better than no plan at all." -- Mikhail Tal
|
|
12-31-2010, 01:58 PM,
|
|
noob
Sergeant
|
Posts: 68
Joined: Feb 2012
|
|
RE: Opponents wanted
(12-31-2010, 06:06 AM)Jobu88 Wrote: (12-30-2010, 08:41 PM)mash Wrote: "Yes CMAK is OK. Send to [email protected]"
Nice one, i have chosen a H2H scenario so it should be balanced, any side preference ?
Either side is OK :cheeky:
Ok, i'm going Allies, the scenario i went for isn't a H2H one after all, it says its slightly pro allies and the more experienced player should take the axis so you can decide after the game if you think it was balanced enough to regard it as a ladder game, otherwise we can just class it as a fun game for no score.
|
|
|