Hey Pepe:
Just an observation...
You "seem" to be doing a lot of "fence sitting" when it come to purchasing PzC games - asking lots of questions about game balance and soliciting input / feedback from other players.
Nothing wrong with that... especially if you enjoy the "view!"
I think it can be helpful to better understand other players' impressions of the PzC game titles.
It "may" provide some guidance to buyers of perspective titles.
However... at some point it all boils down to your WW2 gaming interests; Early war versus late period? Eastern Front versus West Front or Mediterranean?
What interests you historically?
For me, my historical interests are the primary driver in my PzC game buying decisions followed by a review of the game scenario database (Balance, number of times a match has been recorded, number of small, medium, and large scenarios, etc.) What other players think of a game helps round out the data points.
However, if a number of players agree that a specific game has a lot of "balanced H2H scenarios," but I don't have an interest in that war period, it's doubtful I would purchase it. Why? Simply because I see myself not as a collector of PzC and MC game titles, but as a player of them! I've got to enjoy what I am playing especially given the time investment needed for a PBeM match.
Hopefully, you will be able to make a purchase decision and move forward with it shortly.
There's too much gaming to get done... and it's tough to do it while you are sitting on the fence!
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /