Clash of Armour-Kursk43 - Century of Warfare, TOAW III, and TOAW IV
2 - 0 - 2
| Rating: | 3.15 (4) |
| Games Played: | 4 |
| SM: | 5 |
| Turns: | 50 |
| Type: | Custom |
| First Side: | Axis |
| Second Side: | Russia |
| Player Voting Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| Member | Balance | Enjoyment |
 Mad Mat |
Moderately Pro Russia | 8 |
 BillWallace |
Moderately Pro Russia | 2 |
 Fulcrum |
Totally Pro Axis | 1 |
| Fulcrum |
Totally Pro Axis | 1 |
| Gaming Records | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Side Player | 2nd Side Player | Result | Score | ||||||
|
 |
Fulcrum | vs. | ironside |  |
|
Russia Overwhelming Loss | 10 | 55 |
|
|
Fulcrum | vs. | ironside | |
|
Axis Overwhelming Victory | 55 | 10 |
|
 |
BillWallace | vs. | flip0009 |  |
|
Russia Overwhelming Victory | 55 | 10 |
|
 |
fluidwill | vs. | Mad Mat |  |
|
Axis Overwhelming Loss | 10 | 55 |
I did not enjoy this scenario. The biggest problem was all of the fixed units and confusion as to what to do, leading to many easy to surround units. Also there are dozens of 'ant' units that may be historically accurate in some sense, but harm playability and are annoying. It just generally wasn't very fun.
){kind=link}