Operation Barbarossa (20km) - Century of Warfare, TOAW III, and TOAW IV
17 - 2 - 21
| Rating: | 8.03 (19) |
| Games Played: | 40 |
| SM: | 4 |
| Turns: | 32 |
| Type: | Custom |
| First Side: | Axis |
| Second Side: | USSR |
Richard
Fishkoff
Harpooner| Gaming Records | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Side Player | 2nd Side Player | Result | Score | ||||||
|
 |
Fulcrum | vs. | Sapper |  |
|
USSR Overwhelming Victory | 44 | 8 |
|
|
Fulcrum | vs. | Sapper | |
|
Axis Overwhelming Loss | 8 | 44 |
|
 |
Freyr Oakenshield | vs. | Choowee |  |
|
USSR Forfeit Win | 20 | 0 |
|
|
Freyr Oakenshield | vs. | Iriglin |  |
|
USSR Forfeit Win | 20 | 0 |
|
 |
Captain Al | vs. | SGT Rice |  |
|
USSR Marginal Loss | 16 | 28 |
A very good, well-designed scenario. It\'s very well-balanced. While the beginning belongs to Germany, the ending is clearly Russia\'s. You need to strike and defend at the right moment to take advantage of your forces\' advantages and disadvantages.
My YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwXNI5ii4_WIzfA1Yi0Hp-w --- My Twitch channel: https://www.twitch.tv/freyr_oakenshield
Scenario briefing needs more details ... for example, no details on movement restrictions for Finnish troops (there's a line on the map; that's it), stacking restrictions for Axis minors
){kind=link}