#411120_02v: Rommel Wakes Up - North Africa 1941
0 - 0 - 4
| Rating: | 4.63 (3) |
| Games Played: | 4 |
| SM: | 1 |
| Turns: | 12 |
| Type: | Stock |
| First Side: | Axis (NA41) |
| Second Side: | Allied (NA41) |
Sidi Rezegh, southeast of Tobruk: November 20th, 1941. (Scenario Size: Regiment. Head to Head or Allied vs AI. This scenario uses variable objective victory points). Rommel had ignored the British moves around Sidi Rezegh and to the south for the first 2 days of the operation, but he had finally reacted. The men of z.b.V Africa were tasked with moving on Sidi Rezegh in order to determine the situation in the area and stabilize it. If possible, they were to seize the area, without tank support as the Panzers were operating further southeast. British tank forces with limited infantry support were in the area.
| Player Voting Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| Member | Balance | Enjoyment |
 Geier |
Slightly Pro Allied (NA41) | 5 |
 KG_RangerBooBoo |
Moderately Pro Allied (NA41) | 6 |
 Fhil |
Totally Pro Allied (NA41) | 2 |
| Gaming Records | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Side Player | 2nd Side Player | Result | Score | ||||||
|
 |
Gris | vs. | fastphil |  |
|
Allied (NA41) Major Victory | 12 | 2 |
|
 |
Outlaw Josey Wales | vs. | Fhil |  |
|
Allied (NA41) Minor Victory | 9 | 3 |
|
 |
KG_RangerBooBoo | vs. | scots greys |  |
|
Allied (NA41) Minor Victory | 9 | 3 |
|
 |
Green | vs. | Geier |  |
|
Allied (NA41) Minor Victory | 9 | 3 |
Germans have a long way to cover with essentially an infantry only force and slogging through a "soggy" desert against relatively well defended objectives.
Didn't see any Axis armor so hard on them to move the Allied tanks. To offset that my tanks had a hard time hurting Axis infantry.
Was this scenario tested? If so, what´s the purpose of it or how it should be played? Got nothing against historically one-sided scenarios, but why including this one? It´s one of the most boring one - slow tempo due to weather and it´s just German infantry against British tanks.
){kind=link}