 |
|
Enquiry on H2H - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Combat Mission (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: Enquiry on H2H (/showthread.php?tid=55017) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Enquiry on H2H - Pvt. Sofronije - 03-17-2010 It's too big to attach so here are the links: http://www.tspindler.de/cmak_mod/ http://www.tspindler.de/cmn_mod/ This second link has also CM Normandy mod but I haven't tried that one. I really don't know the answers to the questions you asked me. Maybe you can contact this guy who made the mods... Anyway, hope this helps! 
RE: Enquiry on H2H - Herr Fuchs - 03-17-2010 Currently playtesting "Patton's Gambit" with AJ... RE: Enquiry on H2H - Hedgehog - 03-23-2010 Once again Thank you The Guys who took the time to visit H2H and better still chose a game to play :):bow: RE: Enquiry on H2H - Bear - 03-25-2010 (03-17-2010, 09:01 AM)Mr Chuck Wrote: It's too big to attach so here are the links: Thanx, good stuff. I've come to the conclusion about using CMAK for northern europe. It appears that the OBs are not absolutely comparable. Most important is that the British deployed some seriously heavy weapons in the north, especially tanks and they're not at all available in CMAK. Their are some other differences with other units and allies. Using CMAK for some small engagements in France, Holland, Lux and Germany will work. But overall it's too much like forcing a square peg into a round hole. A determination has to be made: What is more important, the game engine perks of CMAK or historical accuracies of CMBO? I, personally prefer the historical over gameplay, guess that's why I don't do QB. I will use the graphics from the links. Again, thank you CHUCK RE: Enquiry on H2H - Pvt. Sofronije - 03-25-2010 Glad I was able to help!
|
){kind=link}