• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


KAreil's AARs
12-07-2021, 06:30 AM,
#1
KAreil's AARs
[Image: Banner_FWWC_France14.png]





Quote:Along the Gette River, Belgium, 18th August 1914:

Following the fall of Liège, the Belgian Armée de Campagne began solidifying a line of defense along the Gette River.

On 17 August, von Moltke issued instructions to von Kluck to shoulder the Belgian Army away from Antwerp. However, to complicate things, von Kluck was also told that his 1.Armee would be under the orders of 2.Armee's commander von Bülow. The cavalry, under H.K.K.2, would also be reassigned to the 2.Armee to provide security between the two advancing armies. Von Moltke's justification for this was that the 1.Armee and 2.Armee must remain in close proximity during their advance on the north side of the Meuse, so that a gap between them would not form.

Von Kluck was furious and argued that it was his 1.Armee, which was on the flank, that had the strategic challenges necessitating independent action, and as such, required the full use of the H.K.K.2 on the northern flank. But this was to be ignored and von Kluck was forced to drive a wedge between the Belgians and Antwerp with his hands tied.

Historically, the Belgians withdrew to the River Dyle in the afternoon and early evening of the 18th, shortly after Haelen and Diest was taken by storm and their flank was exposed, with the 1er Division d’Armée being the primary force engaged. HRH Leopold II recognized that the Germans were trying to drive a wedge between his army and Antwerp and, shortly after the line along the Dyle was established, ordered a withdrawal. On the 19th of August his army conducted a skillful withdrawal to Antwerp, arriving there by the 20th and thus avoiding the trap.

This scenario ends at the point where the Belgians began falling back to Antwerp.

The main objective for the Belgians is to keep as many German units from exiting the map to the west, and, where possible, hold the objectives to prevent a total rout of the Belgian Army.
The Germans can choose to drive off the Belgian's left flank around Haelen by taking the objectives concentrated in that area; it is assumed that a successful wedge is driven between the Belgians and Antwerp if the Germans can take all of those objectives. The Germans can also choose to bypass the Belgian line and gain points by exiting units on the western map which is the route to Bruxelles. By doing this it should balance out any failure on the Germans to drive the Belgians away from Antwerp, but it will probably not gain them a major victory.
 




T00 of 13 - 0800 am 18.08.1914 - Sicht 5 km:  
[Image: PBEM_0048_00001.jpg]
(CONTRARY TO STANDARDS: Own/Germany=red | Enemy/Entente=blue | VP=gelb -  VALID FOR ALL PICTURES)





Germany:

# Own forces:
+ 1.Armee (nur Teile) - Generaloberst Alexander von Kluck
++ II.ArmeeKorps - General der Infanterie Alexander von Linsingen
+++ 3.Infanterie Division (ca. 14300 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
+++ 4.Infanterie Division (ca. 14600 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
++ III.ArmeeKorps - General der Infanterie Ewald von Lochow
+++ 5.Infanterie Division (ca. 14200 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)
+++ 6.Infanterie Division (ca. 14500 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
++ IV.ArmeeKorps - General der Infanterie Friedrich Sixt von Armin
+++ 7.Infanterie Division (ca. 14200 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
+++ 8.Infanterie Division (ca. 14500 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
++ IX.ArmeeKorps - Generalleutnant Ferdinand von Quast
+++ 17.Infanterie Division (ca. 14200 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
+++ 18.Infanterie Division (ca. 14500 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
+ 2.Armee (nur Teile) - Generaloberst Karl von Bülow
++ Höheres Kavallerie Kommando 2 - General der Kavallerie Georg von der Marwitz
+++ 2.Kavallerie Division (ca. 6400 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)
+++ 4.Kavallerie Division (ca. 3800 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
+++ 9.Kavallerie Division (ca. 4100 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
+++ Jägertruppe (ca. 6000 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
[Image: PBEM_0048_00002.jpg]





# Intention:
Fast breakthrough through the Belgian lines and on to Lovain, prevent organized retreat of enemy forces




# Plan:
From North to South:
+ 2.KD advances west and then south into the area of Aarschot and so gets behind the enemies main line of defence
+ 4.ID attack Diest from the north and then continues to Lovain
+ 3.ID attacks Diest frontally from the east and then continues to Lovain
+ 7.ID advances south of Diest to Lovain
+ 8.ID follows and supports 7.ID
+ 5.ID attacks through the area Geetbets towards Lovain
+ 6.ID attacks south of Geetbets towards Lovain
+ 17.ID attacks through the area Bunsbeek towards Lovain
+ 18.ID follows and supports 7.ID
[Image: PBEM_0048_00003.jpg]





+ 4.KD advances on Tirlemont and will encircle it
+ Jägertruppe assaults Tirlemont
+ 9.KD probes west but is chiefly flank guard of the army
[Image: PBEM_0048_00004.jpg]





--

Entente:

# Enemy forces:
At least several division size units of the Champagne-Armee

# Estimated intention:
Delaying actions towards Lovain and holding the town at all costs.





########## ##########





While my German infantry attacked the Belgian troops along the whole front the 2.KD was dashing towards Aarschot and could snatch it at 1200 right before the Belgian defenders could reach it.
Diest and Haelen were standing strong against German assaults and further south the terrain cost much time when advancing even before attacks could be made.
Tirlemont was found heavily defended and the Jägertruppe was redirected further north. 9.KD probed west and encountered strong Belgian and French forces.
[Image: PBEM_0048_00011.jpg]


[Image: PBEM_0048_00012.jpg]


[Image: PBEM_0048_00013.jpg]





By nightfall of 18.08.1914 both Diest and Haelen were taken by German infantry and cavalry with some Jäger had set up a defensive perimeter at Aarschot. 4.ID was rushed in night marches towards the west while cavalry and 3.ID were screening against the Belgians in the South. The rest of the German infantry could push back the Belgian defending troops but progress was slow and costly. 9.KD in the very south got under attack from strong Belgian forces and had to give way while staying the flank guard of the army. French cavalry was attempting to outflank them via the South.
[Image: PBEM_0048_00019.jpg]


[Image: PBEM_0048_00020.jpg]





The next day brought further slow and costly advances of German infantry along the whole line with several Belgian bataillons getting encircled and wiped out. 4.ID reached Aarschot shortly before strong Belgian forces could start their attack and managed to disrupt most of them. In the South the 9.KD performed an organized retreat to protect the flank of the army.
[Image: PBEM_0048_00029.jpg]


[Image: PBEM_0048_00030.jpg]





With the start of turn 12 of 13 my opponent offered his sword as he didn't see a chance to achieve even a Draw anymore. With hindsight I would say that retreating the Belgian forces now arrayed against Aarschot off the map would have been the better option.
[Image: PBEM_0048_00033.jpg]
"Tapfer. Standhaft. Treu." - PzGrenB.13 Ried/Innkreis
Quote this message in a reply
12-09-2021, 03:57 AM,
#2
RE: KAreil's AARs
Nice AAR.

What was the most difficult decision for you as the attacker in this scenario?

I doubt the Central Powers can win if the Belgians race for the exit hexes, but the scenario is surprisingly dynamic given the short duration and the balance of forces favouring the Germans.

With all the streams and elevation differences, as well as the broken terrain in the south, planning assaults is tricky. The Belgian forces in the south are also quite strong and it's difficult to attack them in strength as most German forces can't easily relocate to the south (in case you want to make a push in that direction as the Central Powers).

The last time I played the scenario as the Central Powers, my forces ended up further west compared to your forces, with a deployment roughly from Bunsbeek to Wesemal, but my opponent concentrated more forces in the Belgian center as opposed to the more northerly concentration in your game.
Quote this message in a reply
12-09-2021, 07:39 AM,
#3
RE: KAreil's AARs
Thank you for posting this excellent AAR.  Smile
Quote this message in a reply
12-10-2021, 12:27 AM,
#4
RE: KAreil's AARs
(12-09-2021, 03:57 AM)ComradeP Wrote: ...
What was the most difficult decision for you as the attacker in this scenario?
...


How much force is required in the South to prevent a breakthrough of the Belgian counter attack.
And how to much forces I have to rush west in the north while screening against the main Belgian forces further south...the battle for Aarschot would have been lost without the 4.ID reaching it just in time.
"Tapfer. Standhaft. Treu." - PzGrenB.13 Ried/Innkreis
Quote this message in a reply
12-10-2021, 06:14 AM,
#5
RE: KAreil's AARs
Nice AAR. Thanks. Can I ask which graphics mods you're using, and where I can get them - they make the map so much clearer that the original graphics.
Quote this message in a reply
12-10-2021, 06:50 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-10-2021, 06:52 AM by KAreil.)
#6
RE: KAreil's AARs
(12-10-2021, 06:14 AM)phoenix Wrote: Nice AAR. Thanks. Can I ask which graphics mods you're using, and where I can get them - they make the map so much clearer that the original graphics.

That AAR was made with the game version before the WDS 4.0 came out. I used most of the map parts of the Belle Epoche MOD from Philipe linked here:

https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards...#pid427459

--

With the new 200-zoom in the engine of the WDS 4.0 version this didn't work in the 2D magnified view anymore but I managed to modify the files a bit and got an acceptable look for that.

https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards...#pid447364

This was intended just for personal use but I got asked to share it so I did. It is not my original work as I just took the original MOD files and played around a bit.
"Tapfer. Standhaft. Treu." - PzGrenB.13 Ried/Innkreis
Quote this message in a reply
07-15-2022, 05:49 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-16-2022, 12:43 AM by KAreil.)
#7
RE: KAreil's AARs
[Image: Banner_PZC_Japan45.png]





The defense of Kyushu 04.11.1945 - PBEM as Japanese

DISCLAIMER:
The game was started as WDS 4.0 version with default/recommended optional rules. A few turns in WDS published the blog post about the balancing problems. We decided to continue the game until the now expected stalemate evolved. For comparison there is an AAR available of the campaign with the upcoming fixes:

https://wargameds.com/blogs/news/panzer-...-revisited
https://wargameds.com/blogs/news/japan-4...nouncement
https://wargameds.com/blogs/news/japan-4...t-part-two



Quote:November 4, 1945  -  Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan

This campaign scenario depicts the Operation Olympic plan which was to invade the island of Kyushu for use in the second part of Operation Downfall as a base for aircraft and ships. The Allies knew that the Japanese already anticipated their plan and had based an enormous force on the island. What they didn't know was the exact location of the Japanese reserves. The Japanese were careful to disguise their fortifications and troop locations. Any attempt at taking Kyushu would come at a stiff price.

This campaign scenario includes Strategy choices for both sides. Different starting locations can be chosen for the Japanese reserves and the Allies have some choices in invasion locations.

The Japanese have Partisan units that enter on the map with a scatter value for variable hex entry.

---

With the completion of the campaigns for Okinawa and the Philippines by the end of May 1945 the Allies had drawn much closer to the home islands of Japan. There existed a difference of opinion on whether they should invade Formosa, mainland China or strike at the Japan itself.
With the carrier strikes of Halsey’s fast carrier force, to include British carriers, on airfields throughout Japan the threat of the Kamikaze planes was thoroughly addressed but never totally resolved. General Curtis LeMay’s B-29s had bombed most of the Japanese cities into rubble. The question came: should the Allies invade Japan at all?

One option that the Allies explored was to blockade the home islands. This would keep them from having access to the majority of the crucial raw materials that they needed in order to keep their war machine running. A second option was to invade Japan and conquer it by a protracted land campaign. Another option was to use the atomic bomb. As history has written the final option is the one that the Allies chose. With the dropping of two atomic bombs the Japanese government caved in and surrendered.

Other options were on the table as well but with the unconditional surrender policy in place a negotiated peace was out of the question. Japan must surrender to the Allies and face the consequences of their actions. The Allies would occupy Japan until such time that they felt that they could trust Japan to be a full time, peaceful partner in the years to come.

This title addresses the option to invade Japan instead of using the atomic bomb. The possibility that the Manhattan Project would not have been able to complete a bomb was very real. While the teams were composed of some of the most brilliant minds of their time they had suffered setbacks along the way. What if the project had failed to deliver an atomic weapon by the summer of 1945?

The invasion of Japan, codenamed “Operation Downfall,” was one that the Joint Chiefs of Staff, headed by General Marshall, and the other Allied leaders dreaded mainly because of the casualties it would have cost the Allied forces and the significant amount of resources it would have required. Not only were the US forces stretched to the limit but the system of allowing veterans to be released from duty and sent home left the ranks of the standing US Army and Marine divisions semi-depleted of seasoned officer and enlisted men. The manpower pool for the Allies was limited by the end of 1944 due to the fighting in northwestern Europe. By 1945 the US replacement system was stretched to its limit. The movement of troops, supplies and equipment sorely taxed the US rail and shipping system. Add to it that the other allies had been fighting longer than the US and their contribution was limited in this regard as well.

The island of Kyushu is composed of steep, rugged terrain with many of the hillsides containing rice terraces and dense woods. Rapid, mechanized movement would be next to impossible. Tall, volcanic mountain ranges dominate the interior of the island. The best roads were located along the coast. The rail system, which by the time of the landings would have been heavily damaged, allowed for limited movement. The numerous railroad and highway tunnels allowed for the concealment of forces during daylight hours.

There were a wide range of suitable beach locations for the invasion forces. The Allies had identified six prime locations that they could use and finally settled on three that they would use. This would work to disperse the Japanese defense forces to some degree but the rugged nature of the terrain inland meant that any early advantage gained from the drive inland from the beaches was offset by the limited mechanized movement due to the mountains and high ridges.
A decent interior road system gave the Japanese the opportunity to use their interior lines to their advantage. While rapid movement during the day was out of the question due to the Allied airpower they could use the darkness of the night period to transfer their forces unhampered by the incredible air arsenal of their enemy.
The US planners had identified Ariake Bay and especially the Kagoshima harbor as key objectives during their planning. These deep water areas would be used to supply the attacking forces. While it would take some time to make them usable their access would be invaluable in the later part of the campaign.
 



T000 of 195 - 0600 am 04.11.1945 - View 5 km, Soft conditions:  
[Image: PBEM_0051_00001.jpg]
(CONTRARY TO STANDARDS: Own/Japan=red | Enemy/US/Allies=blue | VP=gelb -  VALID FOR ALL PICTURES)

Japan:
# Own forces:
+ 16.Area Army (Regional Armee entspricht etwa einer deutschen Armee, ca. 230000 Mann)
++ 40.Army (entspricht etwa einem deutschen ArmeeKorps, ca. 56000 Mann)
+++ 77.Divison (ca. 9300 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)
+++ 146.Divison (ca. 124000 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)
+++ 206.Divison (ca. 11000 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B )
+++ 303.Divison (ca. 9300 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
+++ 125.Brigade (ca. 4500 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)
+++ 37.Panzer Regiment (ca. 40 Panzer, Truppenqualität B)
+++ 5.Brigade (ca. 3900 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)
+++ 6.Brigade (ca. 4800 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)

++ 57.Army (entspricht etwa einem deutschen ArmeeKorps, ca. 90000 Mann)
+++ 25.Division (ca. 9400 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)
+++ 86.Divison (ca. 9400 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)
+++ 154.Divison (ca. 11000 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
+++ 156.Divison (ca. 11000 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
+++ 212.Divison (ca. 10000 Mann, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 98.Brigade (ca. 5000 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
+++ 364.Infanterie Brigade (ca. 2700 Mann, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 5.Panzer Brigade (ca. 130 Panzer, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 6.Panzer Brigade (ca. 70 Panzer, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 57.Divison (ca. 11000 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
+++ 4.Panzer Brigade (ca. 120 Panzer, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 1.Brigade (ca. 4400 Mann, Truppenqualität A)
+++ 2.Brigade (ca. 3600 Mann, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 3.Brigade (ca. 4000 Mann, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 4.Brigade (ca. 4200 Mann, Truppenqualität B bis A)

+++ Area Reserve (Regional Reserve, ca. 24000 Mann)
+++ 216.Divison (ca. 9800 Mann, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 118.Brigade (ca. 4100 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)
+++ 122.Brigade (ca. 4100 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)
+++ 126.Brigade (ca. 4100 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)

++ 56.Army (entspricht etwa einem deutschen ArmeeKorps, ca. 36000 Mann)
+++ 145.Division (ca. 11000 Mann, Truppenqualität B)
+++ 312.Divison (ca. 10300 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)
+++ 351.Divison (ca. 9400 Mann, Truppenqualität C)
+++ 124.Brigade (ca. 5300 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)

++ 36.Army (entspricht etwa einem deutschen ArmeeKorps, ca. 26000 Mann)
+++ 81.Division (ca. 9200 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis A)
+++ 214.Division (ca. 10200 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B)
+++ 1.Panzer Division (ca. 71 Panzer, Truppenqualität B bis A)
+++ 4.Panzer Division (ca. 220 Panzer, Truppenqualität B bis A)
[Image: PBEM_0051_00002.jpg]





# Intention:
Prevent allied landings on Japanese home islands.

# Plan:
Imperial Navy and Air Force will do as much as posssible to inflict high losses during allied landing operations (simulated by the game). Landed allied troops will be contained and destroyed by Imperial army.

--

Allies:

Enemy forces:
Very strong ground troops from US Marine Corps and US Army supported by US and other Allied Naval forces and US air forces.

# Estimated intention:
Amphibous landing at Kyushu followed expanstion and linkup of landings sites. Afterwards further advances northwards.




########## ##########




The first day of combat saw the US 2. and 5. Marine Division landing at the beaches south of Sendai. The very strong US forces established and expanded the bridgehead rapidly and the lone Japanese 303.Division was steadily pushed back with high losses.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00027.jpg]





At Ariake-Wan the US army forces (43.ID, Americal Division, 1.CavalryDivision) had similar success against the overextended Japanese 86.Division.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00028.jpg]





At Miyazaki there were more Japanese Forces (154.Division and 156.Division) available and the US army forces (25.ID, 41.ID and 33.ID) could not expand the bridgehead that far. In the North US 25.ID and 41.ID could break out of the beach but in the South the 33.ID was still pinned on or near the beach.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00029.jpg]





###

The second day of fighting brought further Japanese retreats, south of Sendai the Japanese 303.Division is reeling under continous attacks. The release of 37.Panzer Regiment, 125.Brigade and 206.Division does help to establish and stabilize the front against the US Marines.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00066.jpg]





The situation was worse for the Japanese forces at Ariake-Wan where the 86.Division was pushed back and partly scattered by the US advance. A big whole in the West of the Japanese line could be plugged by the fresh 98.Brigade and the 77.Division was under way to the Eastern part of the line.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00067.jpg]





At Miyazaki the Japanese forces were slowly retreating but could keep a solid line, effectivly delaying the US forces. Seperated by a major river the US 25.ID and 41.ID could not really support the 33.ID in the South and progress there was even slower.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00068.jpg]





###

By the end of the 3rd day of combat the city of Sendai itself was in danger, the US 5.Marine Division had further expanded the bridghead and stood directly in front of the city where the fresh Japanese 5. and 6.Brigade had established a defensive line. The Japanese 25.Division was coming south to establish a new line to the East of Sendai.
In the South US forces expanded the bridghead too but the Japanes 206.Division could delay them while slowly moving to the Northeast, it was decided to give up the South and the 146.Division was retreating from there behind the front lines.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00105.jpg]





A similar decision was taken Ariake-Wan and a continous delaying battle was fought there. The Eastern flank of the Japanese line was very vulnerable and there was a constant risk of envelopment there.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00106.jpg]





The city of Miyazaki fell that day to US attacks effectivly linking up the landing sites in that area. US forces managed to push back the Japanese forces but the much reduced Japanese 154.Division could be reinforced by the 212.Division, 2.Brigade and 6.Panzer Brigade to stabilize the front.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00107.jpg]





###

The 4th day of the American invasion so short but heavy fighting at the outskirts of Sendai. The Japanese 5.Brigade managed to hold their ground and the US 3.Marine Division decided to leave the city be and continue their push to the East Tanohara where they made slow progress.
The US 5.Marine Divison and newly landed 2.Marine Division expanded their bridgehead to the South and East, trying to cut off the southern forces. Japanese forces managed to delay this and continue to retreat substantial forces from the South, mainly the 146.Division.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00142.jpg]





At Ariake-Wan the delaying action to the North continued with serious combat but no crisis. The newly arrived 4.Brigade established defenses on the western flank while the US forces did not manage the feared envelopment on the eastern flank.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00143.jpg]





The north of the Miyazaki area saw heavy combat but little progress for the US forces. Strong Japanese forces with sufficent artillery managed to hold them at bay and establish a layered line of defense.
In the South the Japanese 156.Division had to retreat further inland but no breakthrough could be achieved by the US.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00144.jpg]





###

The 5th day of combat did not show much change in the overall situation. The US forces at Sendai made very slow progress towards Tanohara in the North and Kagoshima in the South but the Japanese forces retreated the bulk of their southern troops to the North. Parts of the Japanese 303. and 206.Divsion would be cut off in the future but that was price they willingly payed.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00179.jpg]





At Ariake-Wan the slow retreat to the North continued to work well and the newly arrived 216.Division would help to stabilize the intended new line of defense.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00180.jpg]





Not much change at Miyazaki that day. Nearly no progress for the US forces in the North and a well executed delaying action in the South frustrated the enemy high command.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00181.jpg]





###

The morning of the 6th day saw US forces at Sendai attempting another push towards the East but if it all it cost them dearly.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00191.jpg]





At Ariake-Wan the struggling against the stubbornly delaying the Japanese forces brought little progress for the US.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00192.jpg]





Nearly no more progress for the US forces at Miyazaki.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00193.jpg]





###

Here (turn 47 of 195) my valued opponent krmiller judged the situation to be the stalemate that cannot be overcome by the US forces and we ended the game.
[Image: PBEM_0051_00196.jpg]





Some GIF files to show the evolving situation:
[Image: PBEM_0051_00197.gif]


[Image: PBEM_0051_00198.gif]


[Image: PBEM_0051_00199.gif]


[Image: PBEM_0051_00200.gif]


[Image: PBEM_0051_00201.gif]
"Tapfer. Standhaft. Treu." - PzGrenB.13 Ried/Innkreis
Quote this message in a reply
07-15-2022, 11:41 PM,
#8
RE: KAreil's AARs
Love the GIF's! Great AAR.
Quote this message in a reply
07-16-2022, 10:15 PM,
#9
RE: KAreil's AARs
(07-15-2022, 11:41 PM)LordDeadwood Wrote: Love the GIF's! Great AAR.

What he said
cheers
Quote this message in a reply
11-22-2022, 04:57 AM,
#10
RE: KAreil's AARs
[Image: Banner_FWWC_Serbia14.png]





The second invastion in Serbia starting on 06.09.1914 - PBEM as AustriaHungary under his majesty Kaiser Franz Joseph I. von Österreich-Ungarn


Quote:1914_0906_01: Fighting Fire With Fire (2nd Invasion)
Macva Peninsula and surrounding areas, Serbia, 6th September 1914:

Following the stunning defeat of the Austro-Hungarian first invasion of Serbia in August, Austro-Hungarian forces withdrew west of the Drina to lick their wounds and reform.

A dispute then formed in Austro-Hungarian high command where Conrad insisted that the remainder of the 2.Armee be sent to Galicia, while Potiorek insisted that it remain for another invasion. Strategically the greater threat was the Russian Army in Galicia, however politically the defiant Serbians were more important. The political argument won out, primarily due to the fact that the entire cause of the conflict was to bring about a lasting solution to the "Serbia problem", and because Austro-Hungarian failure discouraged Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire from entering the war. To that end, a compromise was made where two divisions of the 2.Armee remained in place for another campaign while the rest was removed for Galicia.

Potiorek prepared for another invasion to be commenced on September 7th, but the Serbians happened to strike first with an offensive of their own. The French and Russians had been pressuring Serbia to go on the offensive and, not wanting to be suicidal, Serbia initially refused but eventually came to the realization that an offensive would be necessary to encourage both France and Russia to supply them with vital shipments of arms and ammunition. To fulfill this request, on September 6th the Serbian Army launched a limited offensive into the Austro-Hungarian Empire, in the fertile region of Syrmia north of the Sava River. In addition, the Serbians also planned something they had themselves wanted to do: a secondary, albeit delayed, offensive into Bosnia which would have the goal of "liberating" Sarajevo and causing havoc on Austro-Hungarian supply lines.

Like fighting fire with fire, the end result was a double offensive as both sides attacked; the Serbians in reaction to somewhat unrealistic allied demands, and Austro-Hungarians as both a spoiling attack and a desperate second attempt to conquer Serbia.

--

This scenario uses the limited objectives feature. The objectives north of the Sava (in the region known historically as Syrmia). The objectives there will expire after so many turns and will be removed from the map. When this happens their ownership and points will be applied permanently in the state when they expired (in other words, whoever owns the objective at the time of expiration will permanently be awarded the Victory Points). This means that the Serbians must act in a timely manner to take these objectives, and the Austro-Hungarians must do their best to delay and deny their capture. Once the objectives are removed, neither side has any reason to fight over the area and this is represented by the historical fact that strategic emphasis changed as the campaign progressed. Historically, when the objectives expire the Serbians began immediate withdrawal of Syrmia, to hastily move those units to reinforce the battle that was now raging in the Macva Peninsula.

The successful capture of many of the Syrmian objectives (those north of the Sava) by Serbian forces would have represented a successful fulfillment of their obligation to Russia to apply offensive pressure on Austro-Hungary. The possible points gained from this offensive helps negate any Austro-Hungarian gains at the end of the scenario, thereby requiring the Austro-Hungarians to take more objectives for a victory. In essence, it is a high stakes game where the Serbians must take some risks (the exact risk level is up to the Serbian commander) in order to put more pressure on the Austro-Hungarians to have to accomplish more at the end of the campaign. As mentioned, the number of Syrmian objectives the Serbian commander wishes to push for is up to him, but bear in mind that historically the Serbians recognized that they had to quickly move to reinforce the 3rd Army, so it is a careful economy of force type dilemma. That said, it is imperative that the Serbians try to take as many objectives in Syrmia as possible, given that the scenario begins in a draw situation. If the Serbians ignore Syrmia, then the best result they can realistically hope to obtain at the end of the campaign is a draw (which is unlikely given that they would be expected to hold all their starting objectives east of the Drina by the end of the Austro-Hungarian offensive!).

The Serbian Timok I Division's starting disposition must be explained. Basically, the division was assigned to cross the Sava on the left front of the attack into Syrmia after a long approach march to the river from the Bogaric area. Unfortunately the already fatigued division's crossing was opposed by one of the better Austro-Hungarian divisions in the area: the 29.InfanterieDiv who stayed behind when the k.u.k. 2.Armee left for Galicia. Half of the Timok I Division crossed the Sava by small rafts during the evening and night of September 5th on a one way trip, expecting a pontoon bridge to be built behind them during the day. During the day the Timok bridging engineers continued building their bridge only to discover that they did not have enough bridging materials available to finish it properly it (the bridge extended to about 50 meters short of the far bank when it was "completed"). The Serbian 13. and 15. Infantry Regiments attacked as they were told, running into the entire Austro-Hungarian Infanterieregiment Nr.74 who was, in its entirety, attending Sunday church services in Sascini (hence their strange starting deployment). IR.74 sprang into action and checked the Serbian advance, while the rest of the 29.InfanterieDiv converged. For the rest of September 6th and part of the 7th a battle was fought as the 29.InfanterieDiv strangled the Serbian 13. and 15. Infantry Regiments out of existence, with their backs to the Sava and very limited supplies able to reach them from the partially complete pontoon bridge. In the end Serbian soldiers either surrendered or tried to swim across the Sava, drowning as they attempted to reach the unfinished bridge that was now under fire from Austro-Hungarian forces. The commander of the Timok I Division was relieved of duties in disgrace (and even imprisoned) following the action, due to it being determined that his failure in command effectively caused half of the division to be destroyed. For the Serbian Army who did not have the resources of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the loss of two full regiments of I Ban infantry was a catastrophe of epic proportions. The Austro-Hungarian Army celebrated the event as "the destruction of the Timok Division at Sasinci".

As the Serbian commander, it is possible to save the cut off 13. and 15. Infantry Regiments (henceforth referred to as the Jarak crossing). You can either proceed with a ferry and boat crossing of the rest of the division at Mitrowitz with the goal of supporting the units at the Jarak crossing. However this is an "all-in" choice that may risk the destruction of the whole division, or it may allow the division to solidify for a better chance of extracting it via boats, ferry, and completed pontoon bridge. Another alternative is to not risk the Mitrowitz crossing at all and cut your losses, but to hold at the Jarak crossing until the pontoon bridge is fully completed (which is rationalized to represent the bridging unit acquiring more materials from the nearby forest). And finally, you could choose to continue the attack at both crossings with the goal of linking up with the rest of the Serbian 2. Army attacking in Syrmia to the east.

The Danube II Div arrived late for the attack on Symia (8 September). By this time the Austro-Hungarians had started their own second offensive across the Drina and historically the Danube II Div was diverted immediately south towards Pecka and transferred to 3. Army to help hold back the advance of the k.u.k. 6.Armee. The Danube II Div arrives in the location when it was diverted south so that the Serbian commander can either choose to do this historical move, or add it to the Syrmian offensive for greater momentum.

The k.u.k. 21.Landwehr InfanterieDiv was in a special situation following the 1st Invasion of Serbia. This is the same division that in August was routed off of Mount Cer and nearly destroyed. In the period between the 1st and 2nd invasions, this division was prioritized for replacements and swelled in strength from an estimated 40% to 80% strength and recovered much of its losses. However one thing that could not be easily replaced was professional leadership which was instead replaced with reservists and landsturm cadre at this time. To represent this, during the 2nd invasion the division's brigade HQs are -1 level in quality.

The Austro-Hungarian k.u. 109.LstIBrig. (6.Armee) is withdrawn on September 16th (random probability, so the withdrawal may get delayed). This withdrawal represents the historical pressure being placed upon the Austro-Hungarians in Bosnia. By that time the Serbians had invaded Bosnia and were advancing on Srebrenica, so the Austro-Hungarians pulled this brigade back to protect the right rear flank of 6.Armee. This is also why the k.u. 109.LstIBrig's starting area is closed off with impassible hexes - in order to prevent the Serbian commander from doing something gamey and advancing into the rear of 6.Armee after this brigade withdraws (historically the brigade would have been able to react to any Serbian advance in the area).

Note that historically the Austro-Hungarian second invasion was planned to begin with an advance by the 5.Armee on September 7th, but for technical and logistical reasons Potiorek delayed this until September 8th (which is when 6.Armee was scheduled to advance), so in this scenario both armies are fixed until September 8th. The Serbians are advised to use this delay to their advantage by taking what they can in Syrmia before considering a redeployment of their 1. Army to counter the Austro-Hungarian offensive.

As the Serbians, take precaution to protect your pontoon bridges from Austro-Hungarian river monitors. The way you protect the bridges is by leaving your field artillery in key positions along the Sava River, so that the monitors will have to run the gauntlet to get to the bridges, either severely damaging or destroying the ships as they pass, which will be very expensive in Victory Points for the Austro-Hungarians (one of the heavier monitors can be worth from 30 to 40 Victory Points each). Note that the monitors can crash through and destroy pontoon bridges, but they have to be adjacent and have to have full movement allowance available. One effective way that bridges can be protected is by placing field artillery in the hex adjacent to the pontoon bridge so that it is able to mass fire on the monitors as they stop to prepare for ramming the pontoon bridge. If your pontoon bridges are destroyed, then you can either choose to bring up other bridge units to build more, or strictly use full hex ferry crossings, or engineers with boats (although your supply situation north of the Sava River will suffer significantly if no pontoon bridges are available). Also, although the Serbians may not be able to sink any or all of the Austro-Hungarian monitors, the monitors are valuable and damaging them can still yield a high level of Victory Points.

The Austro-Hungarian 5.Armee (Macva Peninsula sector) should be completely methodical in their Drina crossings - this is an attritional fight! Their first goal is very limited: to gain a foothold across the Drina, and then solidify it, constantly looking to expand out slowly, where they can, but never pushing so hard that they exhaust themselves, or else they risk a collapse of the bridgehead. Primarily their objective should be to survive. Even if the 5.Armee doesn't advance far, its bridgehead and presence will force the Serbians to tie down equal amounts of forces against them, which means those forces cannot be sent to fight the 6.Armee to the south.

The Austro-Hungarian 42.Honvéd InfanterieDiv moved south immediately and crossed the Drina near Batar. Consider this option as it will spread out the Serbians, but it will also spread out Austro-Hungarian forces as well. Another advantage of this move is that the Serbs do not expect it, and the Serbian division opposite of this area (Drina II Div) is not released until the 11th, allowing the Austro-Hungarian forces to establish a safe and secure bridgehead before making contact with this division at the time of their choosing. If you decide to cross the Drina near Batar, the Austro-Hungarians are advised not to move forward towards the Sor-Kozjak until the 42.HID is completely established, because line of sight will cause the Drina II Div to release immediately!

The Austro-Hungarian 36.InfanterieDiv at first moved to cross the Drina opposite of Badovinci and Klenje. It suffered losses, and then withdrew, then moved south and crossed again in front of Prujavor, which again met heavy resistance again and stalled. If the XIII.Korps moves south, then the Austro-Hungarian commander can decide from several options. Additionally, attacking across the Drina and withdrawing, to rest and attack somewhere else later does have a benefit of keeping the Serbians guessing. An unaccounted division is a threat to them. Attacking in several places along the Drina prevents the Serbs from being able to concentrate, and spreads their attention to several bridgeheads rather than just one or two. There is also a benefit of delaying the XIII.Korps crossings for some days (historically this corps was slow in its crossings), as this also keeps the Serbians guessing, and may tempt the Serbians to weaken the potential crossing areas as they move to reinforce other places.





T000 of 131 - 1200 am 06.09.1914 - Visibilty 4km:  
[Image: PBEM_0053_00001.jpg]
(CONTRARY TO STANDARDS: Own/AustriaHungary=red | Enemy/Serbia=blue | VP=yellow-  VALID FOR ALL PICTURES)





AustriaHungary:

# Own forces:

+ k.u.k. 5.Armee - General der Infanterie Liborius Ritter von Frank - attacks from 08.09.1914 an
++ VIII.Korps (Prag)
+++ k.u.k. 9.ID (ca. 12800 Mann, Truppenqualität E bis B [k.u.k IR 73 „Albrecht von Württemberg“] )
+++ k.k. 21.LID (ca. 11400 Mann, Truppenqualität E bis C)
++ XIII.Korps (Angram)
+++ k.u.k. 36.ID (ca. 14300 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
+++ k.u. 42.HID (ca. 12300 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
++ k.u.k. 29.ID (ca. 13400 Mann, Truppenqualität D bis C)
++ k.u. 104.LandsturmInfanterieBrigade ab ca. 07.09.1914 verfügbar (ca. 12900 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
++ 2.LandsturmEtappenBrigade (ca. 2153 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
++ 4.LandsturmEtappenBrigade (ca. 3800 Mann, Truppenqualität D)

+ k.u.k. 6.Armee - Feldzeugmeister Oskar Potiorek - attacks from 08.09.1914 an
++ XV.Korps (Sarajevo)
+++ k.u. 40.HID (ca. 13600 Mann, Truppenqualität D bis C)
+++ k.u.k. 48.ID (ca. 19000 Mann, Truppenqualität E bis C)
+++ k.u.k 13.IBrig (ca. 7600 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
+++ MarschFormationen 40.HID (ca. 6400 Mann, Truppenqualität E bis C)
++ XVI.Korps (Ragusa)
+++ k.u.k. 1.ID (ca. 12100 Mann, Truppenqualität D bis C)
+++ k.u.k. 18.ID (ca. 10000 Mann, Truppenqualität D bis C)
+++ 1.GbBrig (ca. 5500 Mann,  Truppenqualität E bis C)
+++ 2.GbBrig( ca. 5500 Mann,  Truppenqualität E bis C)
++ Gruppe Gabriel
+++ 4.GbBrig (ca. 5500 Mann, Truppenqualität D bis C)
+++ 5.GbBrig (ca. 5500 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
++ k.u. LandsturmIBrig 109 (ca. 6409 Mann, Truppenqualität D) - also responsible for defense of Bosnia

+ Gruppe Lütgendorf - Feldmarschallleutnant Kasimir Dominik von Lütgendorf - available from 09.09.1914
++ k.u.k. 7.ID - available from 06.09.1914 an (ca. 9400 Mann, Truppenqualität C bis B [Niederösterreichisches k.u.k. Feldjägerbataillon Nr. 21])
++ Garnison Peterwardein - not planned for offensive
++ k.u. LstIR 12 (ca. 3200 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
++ k.u. LstIR 32 (ca. 3200 Mann, Truppenqualität D)
++ k.u.k. Luftfahrtruppe (16 Flugzeuge zur Aufklärung)

+ Donau-Flotille (11 Schiffe)



# Intention
Defending against the Serbian forces that attacked across the Sava, finally destroying them.
General offensive across the Drina to take the East and especially the Northeast of Serbia. Fighting in the mountains in the South of the HKL should be kept to a minimum to draw enemy forces here.
[Image: PBEM_0053_00003.jpg]






# Plan:

+ k.u.k. 29.ID, 4.LandsturmEtappenBrigade, 2.LandsturmEtappenBrigade, k.u. 104.LandsturmInfanterieBrigade, k.u. LstIR 12, und k.u. LstIR 32 prevent breakthrough of Serbian forces North of the Sava; At the start only 29.ID and 4.LEB are available. Depending on the evolving situation, the HKL will have to be taken back temporarly. Counter attacks should be aimed at the bridging sites to trap the enemy North of the Sava.
[Image: PBEM_0053_00004.jpg]





+ k.k. 21.LID crosses Sava and follows k.u.k. 9.ID across Drina
+ k.u.k. 9.ID crosses Drina via fords and advances Southeastwards through Bogatic to Sabac
+ k.u.k. 36.ID crosses Drina to take Badovinci and then advances towards Sabac
+ k.u. 42.HID crosses Drina south of  Badovinci and supports advance towards Sabac; Another small crossing will be attempted further to the South to bind enemy forces there
Attention, where exactly the main crossing of the Drina will happen is not yet decided but depending on enemy dispositions.
[Image: PBEM_0053_00005.jpg]





+ k.u. 40.HID builds bridge across Drina at Kozluk and takes Loznica, advances further towards Lesnica and/or CER
+ k.u.k. 48.ID moves North and supports 40.HID, mountain troops earmarked for attack on CER
+ k.u.k 13.IBrig crossed Drina via fords and is advancing South of GUCEVO to keep enemy occupied, more a feint than anything else
[Image: PBEM_0053_00006.jpg]





+ Gruppe Gabriel moves North and croses Drina at 40.HID, advances further towards CER and Sabac
+ k.u.k. 1.ID is gathering at Sopotnik and general reserve
+ 1.GbBrig builds bridge across Drina and advances into the mountains of JAGODJNA; should draw enemy forces South
+ k.u.k. 18.ID crosses Drina via fords and advances into the mountains of JAGODJNA; should draw enemy forces South
+ 2.GbBrig crosses Drina via fords and advances into the mountains of JAGODJNA; should draw enemy forces South
+ k.u. LandsturmIBrig 109 threatens Ljubovija and recons Serbian positions south of JAGODJNA; might have to move to Bosnia
[Image: PBEM_0053_00007.jpg]

--

Serbia:

# Enemy forces:
Pretty much the complete Serbian with all 3 mobilization waves/"Ban". Expected are several armies with many divisions and independent detachments supported by numerous Chetnik partisan units. High combat value and morale is expected, troop quality probably mostly B and some elite with A.

# Estimated intention:
Fast and strong Serbian advance North of the Sava. With the developing offensive across the Drina the Serbs will have to withdraw again. On the Drina the Serbian forces are expected to be much stronger than in the 1st invasion and therfor hold their ground much more often.




########## ##########




The first day of combat saw 2 Serbian bridgeheads North of the Sava. The one near Mitrowitz could be contained by the k.u.k. 29.ID and k.u. 104.LandsturmInfanterieBrigade but was steadily reinforeced via pontoon bridge. The other bridgehead further downstream was checked for the moment by k.u. LstIR 12 and 32 but these regiments were far too weak to hold the line. The bulk of k.u.k. 7.ID was marching from Belgrad to contain this bridgehead.
The AustriaHungarian offensive across the Drina had not yet started.
[Image: PBEM_0053_00026.jpg]

###





Another day saw both Serbian bridgeheads expanding but they were still contained. The  k.u.k. 7.ID had arrived in the nick of time to delay the Serbian divisions "Sumadija I" and "Danube I" but they had to slowly retreat towards the North.

The offensive across the Drina had started but strong Serbian positions at Badovinci and North of it made advances were difficult and costly. The k.u. 42.HID had found a gap in the Serbian line South of Badovinci and advanced through it. This was hoped to be a good place for the point of main effort (Schwerpunkt).

Further South at Loznica and GUCEVO very strong Serbian positions were encountered and progress was very limited.

In the JAGODJNA there was surprisingly little Serbian resistance and the progress was only slowed down by the very difficult mountain terrain.

The k.u. LandsturmIBrig 109 found Ljubovija only held by weak local forces and crossed the Drina to take it.
[Image: PBEM_0053_00054.jpg]

###





The third day of combat resulted in further expanding Serbian bridgeheads North of the Sava. The k.u.k. 7.ID was pretty much spent and would not be able to contain the Serbian troops much longer. Near Mitrowitz the situation was better but the enemy slowly advanced towards the city.

At the lower Drina parts of Badovinci were taken and the k.u. 42.HID made a risky advance to encircle the Serbian troops North of it. Only weak forces continued to attack at the Sava mouth and all other troops concentrated Badovinci. All the while keeping some troops further South to feint an attack there.

Even further South Locznia was enveloped to the North by k.u. 40.HID and small gains could be made against the strong Serbian positions.

In the JAGODJNA the peaks of the important MACKOV KAMEN were taken and the advance continued towards KOSUTNJA STOPA. There were still only weak Serbian forces active and they were annihilated after encircling them.

Ljubovijawas taken by k.u. LandsturmIBrig 109 and prepared for defense. More Serbian forces were spotted by these were just local detachments.
[Image: PBEM_0053_00097.jpg]

###





A few hours later the Serbian government sued for peace (Early Termination Victory) although their army was far from beaten.

The Serbian bridgeheads north of the Sava were still contained but ever more ground had to be given up. With the AustriaHungarian forces there already spent, a breakthrough would have ensured sometime the next day.

The battle of Badovinci had seen even more encircled Serbian troops but the fresh division "Timok II" was approaching and could have been a big problem.

At Loznica slow progress was achieved but at a terrible cost. Overall the intended breakthrough to CER and Sabac would have been very difficult to impossible to achieve.

The JAGODJNA won the war for AustriaHungary. The surprisingly weak Serbian resistance there allowed the taking of the critical mountain ranges of MACKOV KAMEN and KOSUTNJA STOPA. This threatened the Serbian rear and gave us victory.
[Image: PBEM_0053_00110.jpg]


[Image: PBEM_0053_00111.jpg]

###





At turn 27 of 131 the game ended with an Early Termination Victory for AustriaHungary.

Some GIF files to show the evolving situation:
[Image: PBEM_0053_00112.gif]


[Image: PBEM_0053_00113.gif]


[Image: PBEM_0053_00114.gif]


[Image: PBEM_0053_00115.gif]
"Tapfer. Standhaft. Treu." - PzGrenB.13 Ried/Innkreis
Quote this message in a reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)