Amazing

[Kelen]

This is why I have been posting the Ladder results with the criteria that I have. I use the last 12 months as a filter and 10+ games reported in that time. I look at only the win% and the ELO score. This way, I find gives everyone a chance to break into the top 10, and every month that it is done is the same as the previous one so I am comparing apples to apples. Just look at the last post of Ladder results that I put up and you can see the movement that can happen, and someone who reports 10 games can be juged along with the players that report 100 games over the same period. Will there be some scewed results?... Sure, but sometimes the poorer team wins the trophy in any sport, just because they can put together a little streak at the right time. Same here, go 10 for 10 in a year against the top players and you will find yourself near the top 10 if not in it. It allows for the showing of some "movers and shakers" without having to be here playing for 4+ years. And it is all in competative fun anyhow.

Totally agree Ratzki, and It's interesting to see how looking at only a 12 month period can change the look of the top of the ladder. (Still not expecting to see myself there anytime soon, but it does give others a crack at the top).

I for one hope you keep posting these snapshots. Cheers.