NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85

[Narwan]

No - 1989 is not a good start for 1985 - there were a lot of changes happening at around '84 and '85, now that said, you're certainly welcome to do with it and the game OOB as you see fit based on your own vision.

We gave a lot of consideration to the model we used for this what if war.

Glenn Saunders

Sounds a bit like a contradiction to me. If not a good starting point for figuring out which units were available in reality that the game leaves out (like the HS) how would you call it? If there hadn't been changes from 85-89 it wouldn't be a starting point to work back from but an endpoint.

@ Boersma:
I like your winterwar additions! Your dutch OB is far closer to reality. I do feel the dutch should have independent SP-AT units (cie or even platoons like the germans) as that was the main weapon supposed to deal with the hordes of WP armor. The whole dutch concept for combat operations was linked to that. Any chance of that? ;-)

Narwan