• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85
12-13-2008, 04:02 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-09-2009, 02:57 AM by JDR Dragoon.)
#60
RE: NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85
Som minor additional suggested changes to the LandJut OOB[/u]:

-An exception to the above allocation of Morale values (about a 50/50 split between C and D value units in the Jutland Division) is the III. Armoured Battalion/JDR. This unit was the armys "showcase" battalion and also serviced the armys Tank and Infantry Training School which was co-located in the same garrison. It also served as OPFOR battalion for the rest of the army battalions in Jutland, which would periodically go to the Oksbøl training area in order to spar with III/JDR. It was thus the only armoured battalion in the Jutland division that was consciously kept near its TO&E strenght in enlisted personnel all the time. Its two Tank companies and the armoured infantry company is thus rated at "B" (its roundout unit of motorized infantry was still manned with 9 month conscripts and thus retains its "D").

-The parts of the RDAF (Flyvertaktisk Kommando) present in the game has been moved from OPCON of the Jutland Division to LandJut (which should mean that other units under the command of LandJut can also use the RDAF planes without penalty).

-LandJut has also gotten a single 25 man A quality, Deception capable, Heliborne danish SF unit (Jægerkorpset) in OPCON. This follows the logic behind the OOBs of other nations in the stock DF 85 game, where genuine Special Forces/Commando type units are represented, but LLRP type units are not.

-I am still unsure whether or not the Jutland BattleGroup had a single company of old 20 pdr. armed Centurions (some sources says it did, others doesn´t mention it. On the other hand, the sources who doesn´t mention it, doesn´t say anything about the other Battlegroups having old Centurions either, when I know for a Fact that they did. So hmm....). I have tentatively chosen to add it to the OOB for now, mostly to see how it plays in the game.

-So this is about it. This OOB will thus provide the basis for four of the scenario variants outlined above. Have fun.
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85 - by JDR Dragoon - 12-13-2008, 04:02 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)