• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Question about historical accuracy
05-26-2010, 06:56 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-26-2010, 06:57 AM by Volcano Man.)
#2
RE: Question about historical accuracy
Well, it is certainly debatable either way, but generally a company level breakdown approach should be reserved for "western style" armies where small unit tactics and lower level command initiative are encouraged and relied upon. Soviet (but probably not modern Russian) units in a wargame should have some sort of command and control limitation and generally speaking the approach of restricting them to battalion sized units covers this nicely.

You can think of it better that, in maneuver, the WP wields companies as NATO used platoons, and they used battalions in a similar way that NATO used companies (in so much even that a "common" matchup would have been a NATO company versus a WP battalion). Having said that, and barring any Russophiles out there, you can of course make your mod however you see fit. :)
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Question about historical accuracy - by P.Ako - 05-26-2010, 03:51 AM
RE: Question about historical accuracy - by Volcano Man - 05-26-2010, 06:56 AM
RE: Question about historical accuracy - by P.Ako - 05-27-2010, 08:30 PM
RE: Question about historical accuracy - by Aaron - 05-28-2010, 12:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)