Campaign Normandy

[burroughs]

With a turn per week it is going to be about fifteen years - it's doable, but it's like a trip to the stars: not very likely we are getting there, any of us.

I am going to have a look at the scenario set and see what's available since I am still ready to go, but knowing that each normal human being needs some feeling of accomplishment now and then, my suggestion would be to pick something shorter which will run for five - and not fifteen - years perhaps. That's still a long way to go.


Besides JDR is absolutely correct in his opinion - by the way, have a look at the file I am attaching right now with the optional rules I promote and advocate .Had a breif look at the scenarios and think we should go with either of those 250 turn long ones, there are planty of choices to be made. I like the grand scale of the 750 turn long one, it would be a magnificent achievement especially if that had a chance of getting completed in any foreseeable future, but even it's description says it's practically unplayable. Finally , with a team of two per each belligerent, we are going to have plethora of forces to command and at disposal, involving lots of consideration, time and effort to manage everything - a hell of a burden I mean so that would be a war of attrition to get through that maze.

I'd say let's consider the chances carefully. I am participating in two team games in PCs and MCs respectivelly and one SB - even in the Moscow '42 title we decided to skip the monsters and there are five of us, with the new guys highly motivated and efficient, the game going very dynamically, but it's a matter of a smaller and shorter cmpaign having been chosen. The BFTB 4.7 DF '85 campaign stalled with the sad news from Cesar, but the prospects are we're getting back ASAP.